Emile Fradin, peasant-proprietor
of the Glozel hoard, died on February 10th, aged 103
Mar 11th 2010 | From The Economist
DAWN springs up, and the
plough-boy must be at work. So at first light on March 1st 1924 Emile Fradin,
with his grandfather, harnessed the cows to till a field called Duranthon. A putain of
a field, never ploughed before, strewn with rocks and slippy with clay sloping
down into a ravine. The river Vareille flowed at the bottom, scraggy woods
crowned the tops, in a four-house hamlet called Glozel in an unknown corner of
the Allier 12 miles from Vichy in the very middle of France.
The field was all brambles, and
the cattle struggled. One of them, Florence, stumbled into a hole, and the
plough crashed sideways. But the hole, as Emile hauled the cow out, turned out
to be an underground chamber containing axes, ceramic vases, strange scratched
bricks and human bones. Emile smashed a few of the pots to see if there were
coins inside; no luck. The glazed bricks that lined the chamber glistened in
the sun.
Emile was 17 then, some years out
of village school, with an early moustache and a ready, cheeky grin. By the
time he was 25 he would have mixed with professors of prehistory and epigraphy
from all over Europe, with the curator of the Louvre, with the premier
archaeologists of France, and with the law. In his work-clothes and wooden
sabots he watched the strangers come and dig his field, now renamed the Champ
des Morts or Field of the Dead, from which in the end some 5,000 curious
artefacts emerged. But the question that proved hardest to answer—over
which students fought each other with stink-bombs, and butchers’ boys
wrestled in the Paris streets—was whether this was a genuine ancient
burial, Neolithic or even Paleolithic, or whether young Mr Fradin had forged
the lot himself.
A
mysterious alphabet
The finds were hugely intriguing.
Visitors to Mr Fradin’s museum, admission four francs, would
find—will still find—masks and carvings of faces without mouths;
bones pierced with holes, with the sun’s rays scratched round them;
ceramic pots, schist rings, polished stones. Some figures were hermaphrodite idols,
with phalluses in their foreheads. Several bone carvings showed reindeer
running, though reindeer were thought to have died out in that part of France
10,000 years earlier. But most exciting were the dozens of square clay tablets
inscribed with letters which, if Neolithic, predated by many millennia the
Phoenician characters from which Western alphabets were supposed to have
come—making Glozel, not the Middle East, the cradle of Western
civilisation.
This extraordinary argument came
originally from Antonin Morlet, a Vichy doctor and amateur archaeologist who
took over the excavation. Emile had enlisted him, cycling over the hills to
fetch him, because his father was threatening to plant the field. Dr Morlet
paid the Fradins 200 francs a year to dig there, and wrote articles about the
finds in Emile’s name as well as his own. Emile thus became a scholar by
association, signing his name with stylish swagger, though snobbish Parisians
still thought him an “insolent” peasant boy.
Between 1926 and 1928 Dr Morlet
brought in professionals. Some, including a committee of experts, thought the
site was certainly Neolithic, though with a baffling admixture of Iron Age,
Roman and medieval remains. Others dismissed it out of hand. Emile stuck to his
story. When the curator of the Louvre mocked him he sued him for defamation,
David against Goliath. When police, tipped off by the president of the French
Prehistoric Society, raided his farmhouse-museum, carrying away even the
saucepans in which his little brother had been mixing dirt, he yelled at them
and was beaten for it. He was accused of creeping out at night to bury
fresh-scratched stones, but no one proved it. He was formally charged with
fraud, but all the charges were dismissed.
The chief of the Criminal Records Office
in Paris, inspecting the alphabet tablets in 1928, said he found fresh grass in
them, as well as apple stems and fibres from 20th-century clothes. But in 1982
a Swiss scholar thought the tablets and the letters came from Celtic times.
Thermo-luminescence testing in 1973 suggested dates anywhere from 300BC to
1300ad; carbon-dating ranged from the 5th to the 15th century; the Ministry of
Culture, in a curt résumé of 1995, concluded that the site was medieval. Mr
Fradin sat tight, knowing that despite the improbabilities of the site—so
much, from so many ages, all jumbled in one field—each piece that was
declared genuinely old solidified his reputation. In 1990 he was awarded the
Ordre des Palmes Académiques for his discovery. Though argument still raged,
and continues to rage online, he felt vindicated.
He never sold a single item of the
5,000, though many people asked, and the money would have helped a farmer with
a family. He kept the objects safe in their glass cases, some reverently laid
on red cloth.
As for the field called Duranthon,
he never ploughed it. It is archaeology that has broken up the hummocky ground.
And only more impartial digging will resolve the mystery of Glozel. The misty
March trees survey the ghosts of bone-men, Romans, Celts, medieval farmers,
archaeologists in straw hats; and the young Emile Fradin, urging his team
towards the secrets of the dead.
http://www.economist.com/obituary/displaystory.cfm?story_id=15660787
*** *******
This message contains information which may be confidential and privileged. Unless you are the addressee (or authorized to receive for the addressee), you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone the message or any information contained in the message. If you have received the message in error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail and delete the message.
