Lista archport

Mensagem

[Archport] FW: TAG 2010 - Make-do and Mend: The Archaeologies of Compromise?

To :   <archport@ci.uc.pt>
Subject :   [Archport] FW: TAG 2010 - Make-do and Mend: The Archaeologies of Compromise?
From :   Micael Rodrigues <micaelschweiz@hotmail.com>
Date :   Mon, 6 Sep 2010 14:04:19 +0100



Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2010 12:45:26 +0100
From: a.kyle.1@RESEARCH.GLA.AC.UK
Subject: TAG 2010 - Make-do and Mend: The Archaeologies of Compromise?
To: MED-SETTLEMENT@JISCMAIL.AC.UK

 
Dear all,

This is a call for papers for the session we are organising at this years TAG conference, which takes place from 17th-19th December in Bristol. Abstracts of c. 250 words are invited and time slots of 20 mins will be allocated to each paper. Abstracts must be submitted via the TAG website - to do this click on 'Propose a paper' at the bottom of the abstract at this link:
http://www.nomadit.co.uk/tag/tag2010/panels.php5?PanelID=839


The deadline for abstract submissions for this session is Friday 24th September 2010.



Make-do and mend: the archaeologies of compromise?
Ben Jervis (University of Southampton), Alison Kyle (University of Glasgow)

This session considers the artefact, ecofact and building reuse and the use of alternative, sometimes inefficient, methods or materials in past manufacture and resource exploitation. Papers should bring together the archaeometric analyses which identify these phenomena and the social interpretation of these findings.

In their consideration of artefact variability, Schiffer and Skibo (1997) suggest that artefacts are a compromise between efficiency in manufacture and use. We will question this assertion: is the reuse of objects, and the use of inefficient materials, really a compromise or do they have more deep-rooted cultural implications?
Further questions to be addressed include what does the active, physical engagement with objects, required during their repair, tell us about the value of the object in question - whether intrinsic or cultural. Does the lengthening of an objects biographical history through repair impart a cumulative cultural significance upon repaired, as opposed to non-repaired objects? If we accept that material culture had an active meaning, do instances of repair represent maintenance of the original cultural meaning of the object, or the creation of a new hybridised meaning?
We invite papers dealing with the reuse or recycling of artefacts, either for their original or an alternative function, skeuomorphism, or evidence of adaptability to changes in context in the archaeological record. Papers should offer an interpretation of these observations, but also be grounded in the archaeometric analysis of objects, structures, faunal or environmental remains.
 
 
 
PhD Student
Department of Archaeology
University of Glasgow
 
Room 322, Gregory Building, Lilybank Gardens, Glasgow, G12 8QQ
Telephone: +44 (0) 141 330 3925
Email:
a.kyle.1@research.gla.ac.uk
Web: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/archaeology/research/students/akyle/

Mensagem anterior por data: [Archport] Espaços do Desenho | 8 Possibilidades de Fazer Desenho - Ciclo de Workshops | 15 a 25 de Setembro de 2010 Próxima mensagem por data: [Archport] CÂMARA MUNICIPAL DE CASCAIS, DEPARTAMENTO DE CULTURA & CENTRO DE ARQUEOLOGIA DA UNIVERSIDADE DE LISBOA (UNIARQ). LANÇAMENTO DE LIVRO.
Mensagem anterior por assunto: Re: [Archport] FW: Tabelas salariais Próxima mensagem por assunto: [Archport] FW: The Mummies of Barnsley: By gum! England's ancient Egyptians and the mummies buried in Yorkshire | Mail Online