[Thedu] THedu - last call for papers
Dear Members of the THedu Interest Group
Looking forward for a fruitful workshop, here it is the last call for papers,
notice the extended deadline.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
LAST CALL FOR EXTENDED ABSTRACTS - DEADLINE EXTENSION - 15 May
----------------------------------------------------------------------
THedu'12
TP components for educational software
=======================================
(TP -- Computer Theorem Proving)
http://www.uc.pt/en/congressos/thedu
Workshop at CICM 2012
Conferences on Intelligent Computer Mathematics
9.-14. July 2012
Jacobs University, Bremen, Germany
http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/cicm2012/cicm.php
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Important Dates
---------------
* Extended Abstracts/Demo proposals 15 May 2012 (extended deadline)
* Author Notification: 01 Jun 2012
* Final Version: 15 Jun 2012
* Worshop Day: 11 Jul 2012
* Full papers (post-proceedings): 31 Jul 2012 (LaTeX,easychair[2])
THedu'12 Scope
--------------
This workshop intends to gather the research communities for computer
Theorem proving (TP), Automated Theorem Proving (ATP), Interactive
Theorem Proving (ITP) as well as for Computer Algebra Systems (CAS)
and Dynamic Geometry Systems (DGS). The workshop tries to combine and
focus systems of these areas to enhance existing educational software
as well as studying the design of the next generation of mechanised
mathematics assistants (MMA). Elements for next-generation MMA's
include:
* Declarative Languages for Problem Solution: education in applied
sciences and in engineering is mainly concerned with problems,
which involve operations on elementary objects to be transformed
to an object representing a problem solution. Preconditions and
postconditions of these operations can be used to describe the
possible steps in the problem space; thus, ATP-systems can be used
to check if an operation sequence given by the user does actually
present a problem solution. Such "Problem Solution Languages"
encompass declarative proof languages like Isabelle/Isar or Coq's
Mathematical Proof Language, but also more specialized forms such
as, for example, geometric problem solution languages that express
a proof argument in Euklidian Geometry or languages for graph
theory.
* Consistent Mathematical Content Representation: Libraries of
existing ITP-Systems, in particular those following the LCF-prover
paradigm, usually provide logically coherent and human readable
knowledge. In the leading provers, mathematical knowledge is
covered to an extent beyond most courses in applied
sciences. However, the potential of this mechanised knowledge for
education is clearly not yet recognised adequately: renewed
pedagogy calls for inquiry-based learning from concrete to
abstract --- and the knowledge's logical coherence supports such
learning: for instance, the formula 2.pi depends on the definition
of reals and of multiplication; close to these definitions are the
laws like commutativity etc. However, the complexity of the
knowledge's traceable interrelations poses a challenge to
usability design.
* User-Guidance in Stepwise Problem Solving: Such guidance is
indispensable for independent learning, but costly to implement so
far, because so many special cases need to be coded by
hand. However, TP technology makes automated generation of
user-guidance reachable: declarative languages as mentioned above,
novel programming languages combining computation and deduction,
methods for automated construction with ruler and compass from
specifications, etc --- all these methods 'know how to solve a
problem'; so, use the methods' knowledge to generate user-guidance
mechanically, this is an appealing challenge for ATP and ITP, and
probably for compiler construction!
In principle, mathematical software can be conceived as models of
mathematics: The challenge addressed by this workshop series is to
provide appealing models for MMAs which are interactive and which
explain themselves such that interested students can independently
learn by inquiry and experimentation.
Program Chairs
--------------
Ralph-Johan Back, Abo Akademi University, Finland
Pedro Quaresma, University of Coimbra, Portugal
Program Committee
Francisco Botana, University of Vigo at Pontevedra, Spain
Florian Haftmann, Munich University of Technology, Germany
Predrag Janicic, University of Belgrade, Serbia
Cezary Kaliszyk, University of Tsukuba, Japan
Julien Narboux, University of Strasbourg, France
Filip Maric, University of Belgrade, Serbia
Walther Neuper, Graz University of Technology, Austria
Wolfgang Schreiner, Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria
Laurent Théry, Sophia Antipolis, INRIA, France
Makarius Wenzel, University Paris-Sud, France
Burkhart Wolff, University Paris-Sud, France
Submission
----------
THedu'12 seeks papers and demos presenting original unpublished work
which is not been submitted for publication elsewhere.
Both, papers and demos, are submitted as extended abstracts first,
which must not exceed five pages. The abstract should be new
material. Demos should be accompanied by links to demos/downloads and
[existing] system descriptions. Availability of such accompanying
material will be a strong prerequisite for acceptance.
The authors of the extended abstracts and system descriptions should
submit to easychair [2] in PDF format generated by EPTCS LaTeX style
[3]. Selected extended abstracts and system descriptions will appear
in CISUC Technical Report series (ISSN 0874-338X, [1]).
At least one author of each accepted paper/demo is expected to attend
THedu'11 and to present her or his paper/demo, and the extended
abstracts will be made available online.
After presentation at the conference selected authors will be invited to
submit a substantially revised version, extended to 10-14 pages, for
publication by the Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer
Science (EPTCS). Papers/system descriptions will be reviewed by blind
peer review and evaluated by three referees with respect to relevance,
clarity, quality, originality, and impact.
Revised versions are submitted in LaTeX according to the EPTCS style
guidelines [3] via easychair [2].
[1] http://www.uc.pt/en/fctuc/ID/cisuc/RecentPublications/Techreports/
[2] http://www.easychair.org/conferences/?conf=thedu11
[3] http://http://style.eptcs.org/
--
At\'e breve;Deica Logo;\`A bient\^ot;See you later;Vidimo se;
Professor Auxiliar Pedro Quaresma
Departamento de Matem\'atica, Faculdade de Ci\^encias e Tecnologia
Universidade de Coimbra
P-3001-454 COIMBRA, PORTUGAL
correioE: pedro@mat.uc.pt
p\'agina: http://www.mat.uc.pt/~pedro/
telef: +351 239 791 137; fax: +351 239 832 568